Texas reminds us of the value of SaskPower

 

There are a number of reasons why we take good ol’ SaskPower for granted … and maybe sometimes even dislike it.

article continues below

For starters, a government-owned monopoly utility is bound to irritate us because it seemingly can charge what it wants for something we absolutely can’t live without.

This has always been a source of resentment in Saskatchewan — one that’s likely grown as we’ve become more free enterprise in nature.

And while publicly-owned utilities like SaskPower actually pre-date the first Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (which would later become the NDP) government, Crown corporations have always been long-associated with the NDP’s social democratic philosophy. That was cemented in the 1980s when the NDP fought tooth and nail to stop their privatizations.

But ultimately why we still own Crown utilities like SaskPower comes down to our recognition that we do need a stable, reliable and affordable power supply for all.

A snowstorm 1,400 miles to the south of us in Texas now serves as a reminder of that.

The -20 C temperatures Texans faced a couple of weeks ago wreaked havoc on poorly insulated homes, businesses and people more accustomed to enduring tornadoes, hurricanes and summer heat.

About 4.7 million Texas homes and businesses were left without electricity, heat and running water due to burst pipes and frozen natural gas intakes. Power lines downed by ice and freezing rain added to the chaos.

So did wind turbines that account for 15.7 per cent of Texas power that were shuddered by the cold.

We better insulate everything, including our wind turbines — although they only account for 241 megawatts or five per cent of SaskPower’s total 4,893-megawatt generating capacity.

Contrary to the notion held by some that wind turbines don’t work in cold Saskatchewan winters, they continue to spin here in temperatures as low as -30 C (windchill being a non-factor, because wind is the turbine’s friend). In fact, wind turbines here pump out more energy in the colder months.

But besides being prepared for cold, Saskatchewan is more accepting of the reality that distributing electricity to a vast jurisdiction (Saskatchewan is within 4,000 square kilometres of being as big as Texas) requires rules to be followed and a willingness of both businesses and people to co-operate.

What really bogged down Texas even after the power went back on is utility deregulation in that state that’s created a bit of a free-for-all that now sees Texas consumers buy their power from the cheapest private source and sees little in the way of a backup plant for catastrophic events like this snowstorm.

Unlike SaskPower that stops energy exports in times of shortages and also has agreements and means to quickly purchase power from neighbours in a crisis, there is little central planning in deregulated Texas.

So even after power was restored, some Texans were hit with bills of $5,000 for five days because their contracts with private companies allowed them to jack up prices to make up for shortfalls.

Maybe what we saw in Texas is reason to question whether its smart to be handing back rebate cheques back to consumers as the Saskatchewan Party promised last election rather than pumping that money back into SaskPower’s aging infrastructure.

As Texas proved, electricity costs you dearly when you don’t have it.  

© Copyright Carlyle Observer

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Carlyle Observer welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus